Karzai and the Taliban -- Let the negotiations begin
by Stephen Schlesinger

On June 12, 2010, The New York Times reported that Afghan President Hamid Karzai has new doubts that the US and its NATO allies can defeat the Taliban. As a consequence, these days he is seeking to negotiate some sort of peace settlement with the insurgents. However, The Times states, certain members of his own administration are resisting this effort and are openly decrying what he is doing. But is that which Karzai is looking for such a dangerous proposition? Isn't this exactly what the Obama Administration is itself desirous of?
Maybe, indeed, it's time to stop
pouncing on Karzai and give him a break and let him try to work out his own
pacific outcome to the eight year old war (or the 25 years old war if you count
the Russian invasion). After all, he is a Pashtun and his opponents are fellow
Pashtuns, so they might have common grounds on which to parley. Furthermore,
President Obama has set his own date for the beginning of the withdrawal of
American troops from the country as of July 2011 -- which is an implicit
admission that the US will not stay forever fighting Afghanistan's own battles.
Finally much of the opposition to Karzai's overtures are coming from his
Northern allies who are hard-bitten foes of any compromise with the Taliban,
but remain a minority within Afghanistan.
Karzai's approach does not mean
that the Taliban should be treated as equals and that Karzai must give up on
all of the democratic, pro-women, pro-free press gains made over the past
decade in Afghanistan. No one can forget that the Taliban is renowned for its
viciousness as an enemy, killing anybody who opposes its extreme Islamic
ideology out of a fundamentalist rage. But if one is trying to bring an end to
a bloody internal conflict that has dragged on for years, then some energy and
seriousness must be given over to working out a compromise that will restore
the nation to being an orderly community. So such a deed must be sought. This
has proved possible in Nepal where equally destructive Maoists rebels
ultimately worked out a deal with Nepalese democrats that made possible a free
society. Karzai's endeavor, in the end, is about being realistic, not about being weak or misguided or pusillanimous.
Comments