The Power of Amazon
by Peter Osnos

It may not be everybody’s idea of
summer reading, but I am engrossed in Michael Dobbs’s One Minute to
Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War
(Knopf). After reading excellent reviews in the New York Times and the Washington
Post, I flipped the switch on my Amazon Kindle, and within a minute for
$9.99, the book was mine to read at leisure.
The Kindle
was launched last fall and is priced at $359. Amazon is still coy about
revenues from the device and the 125,000 titles available for purchase. In a
recent appearance at Book Expo, CEO Jeff Bezos said Kindle sales now account
for 6 percent of the total revenues of those books. The anecdotal evidence of
friends—and our experience at PublicAffairs of two Kindle bestsellers (books by
George Soros and Scott McClellan)—supports the notion that Kindle (and to a
lesser extent the comparable Sony Reader) is gaining acceptance among a
category of top-end consumers. The main appeal of the Kindle seems to be that
you can buy books through Wi-Fi, which makes downloading a breeze. The
availability of newspapers and magazines is, surprisingly, also a significant
plus, with subscription costs well below the print versions.
The upshot
is that the Kindle is convenient, compact, and for travel, an attractive
alternative to the traditional bundle of print products (okay, not for the
beach). When I last looked, the Dobbs book was on the New York Times bestseller list and is clearly established as a
summer book for a certain kind of reader, proving again that all is not lost in
the annals of quality nonfiction.
There is
another side to the Amazon story that the success of Kindle tends to
underscore. The online bookseller and all-around shopping behemoth has become a
dominant force in the publishing world. From its launch in 1995, the Amazon
model transformed the way books are sold. For the first time, consumers had a
vast selection of titles at their fingertips at great prices and with the
assurance that, once ordered, they would be delivered to your door. For all the
appeal of bookstore browsing and the community service that the best stores
provide, buying a book can be a pokey experience: a clerk tells you the book is
out of stock and that to obtain it you have to put expectation on hold until it
can be located, which may be never.
What Amazon
has done for the book business is make the buying of books a transaction so convenient
and gratifying that you can almost sublimate the guilt about not supporting the
brick and mortar stores, especially the cozy independents that give bookselling
its sense of commercial virtue.
Yet the
better Amazon is for the customers, the tougher it is becoming on the
publishers, especially those below the corporate giants like Random House and
HarperCollins. As the director of a leading university press observed recently,
“Amazon has the best customer relations and the worst publisher relations of
any company I’ve ever dealt with.” The more formidable Amazon becomes as a
retailer of books, the more pressure it puts on suppliers to get terms that
increase its margins, which, given its discounts to consumers and capital
costs, are very narrow.
In March,
Amazon declared that all books to be sold in print-on-demand (POD) formats, an
increasingly important source of backlist and hard-to-find titles, would have
to be provided by its POD subsidiary rather than any outside vendors. In
Britain, Amazon has been in a feud with Hachette, which owns the Little Brown
imprint, and apparently has disabled the “buy” button from the company’s titles
on Amazon’s site. The net effect of what amounts to corporate swaggering is
that Amazon is becoming as fearsome to publishers as it is popular with
readers. Presumably, arrogance is a benefit of power and through its brilliant
strategies of pricing and performance, Amazon has claimed the right to be
prideful.
But the
extraordinary thing about the developments in technology and marketing in the
years since Amazon was founded is that it has also created opportunities for
entrepreneurs to develop their own means for reaching consumers, including
someday doing everything Amazon can and more. This is roughly what happened to
the record store and music companies when the iPod was invented. The video
chains with annoying late fees were undone by NetFlix and video on demand.
A
generation ago, the new force in bookselling was the mall stores (Crown, Walden,
and B. Dalton) that seemed to favor a small selection of titles, threatening
the availability of the vast catalogue of less commercial books. Because of
their limited inventory, among other reasons, the mall stores are now in
inexorable decline (Crown is gone) and books have never been more available, at
least online. Amazon was a breakthrough. The Kindle appears to be another. I am
very glad that Michael Dobbs’s book is for sale in the format I wanted and at a
promotional price.
Still, I
wonder, and so perhaps should Amazon, whether the power it has accumulated can
evaporate. Publishers are giving in to Amazon’s demands for selling terms
because they have little choice. Then, needing to show additional profit,
Amazon will turn to the customers, raising prices, insisting that they buy
proprietary formats such as Kindle and charging for other services. That’s when
the climate for Amazon could get a lot chiller than it is now.
Glad that you are enjoying One Minute to Midnight. You make some interesting points about the Kindle. I had barely heard about the Kindle until people started telling me that they had downloaded my book on it, and were reading it on the machine. The maps and the photographs do not reproduce very well but, apart from that, the reading experience is very similar. I wonder about the endnotes.
I would be interested in your thoughts on the economic model. For a typical book, costing $28, how much goes to manufacturing costs, distribution, and so on, and how much is profit to the publisher. I believe the author gets $4 per book in royalties. How does this break down on the Kindle, and does it offer the publishing industry a viable economic model?
Michael Dobbs
Posted by: Michael Dobbs | July 08, 2008 at 02:24 PM